The Desert Within

Plot

Themes

The primary idea is generated from the reading of the philosopher Sren Kierkegaard, particularly where it accounts for daily life. Kierkegaard's father lived with the conviction that God would punish him by taking away their children prematurely for a sin he had committed.

The existence of Kierkegaard was marked by the guilt and the image of a vengeful and wrathful God. This essence is preserved in the film, but we decided to change the original context, Protestant and Danish, to Mexican and Catholic. The completion of the script was a very long process, where it was severely restructured, one to contextualize the story in Mexico, and another to define the structure into chapters. The Cristiada topic is very interesting and seductive, but that was not our subject, our story was of that family, that guilt, that punishment, that madness.

The Cristero War within the film works more as a backdrop to the theme itself. We knew what we wanted to tell and the characteristics that we overlaid the religious conflict with were ripe to justify certain events which were the substance of our story: the lack of priests in the country and therefore a clear spiritual guide, the prohibition of public worship and the closure of churches, religious exacerbation, all this gave credibility to certain aspects needed in our history. Religion, or more specifically religious fanaticism, it is one of the themes of the film. Atheists or believers, all in some point in life we stand before God, the existence of God. Moreover, religion is a cultural determinant which also flows through us, like it or not, we live in a Judeo-Christian society and our morals are largely structured by it. The notions of our sin and guilt touch everyone in varying degrees. Religion is a controversial and difficult subject, precisely because it is deeply human, and that is why it seemed interesting to raise questions about that.

For us the Desert Within is a film about men, not God, and it is men who largely built his fortune or misfortune, as in this case. If God punishes or forgives is no longer relevant, it is Elias, the central character, who can not forgive himself, and that guilt is sick, that determination to devote their and their children to an authoritarian and oppressive life to seek redemption, which is destroying the family. There may be other interpretations, hopefully they exist, if there are different readings then the movie provides good entertainment.

We like to think that the Desert Within speaks not only of religious fanaticism, but could be a mirror of other types of fanaticism, the capacity for destruction that lurks behind any idea or thought that stands in a totalitarian manner, which respects not the possibility of dissent and ultimately imposes itself with force, whether physical or psychological. Even if that idea is put forward as something allegedly good for everyone. That is what ultimately happens to Elias, he is unable to question the truth, his truth, it is final and that is how, on behalf of the entire family, he chooses a lifestyle, a form of death and a way to God without taking into account the desire of the children. If this is so, if in some way it can be seen as a metaphor, then we believe that even being a period film, the Desert Within can have an echo in contemporary issues.

Awards