Home | Movies By Year | Movies from 1982


The Royal Romance of Charles and Diana

Buy The Royal Romance of Charles and Diana now from Amazon

First, read the Wikipedia article. Then, scroll down to see what other TopShelfReviews readers thought about the movie. And once you've experienced the movie, tell everyone what you thought about it.

Wikipedia article




'The Royal Romance of Charles and Diana' is a 1982 American made-for-television biographical drama film that depicts the wedding of Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer. The film was directed by Peter Levin and starred Catherine Oxenberg, Christopher Baines, Olivia de Havilland, Dana Wynter, Stewart Granger and Ray Milland. It originally aired September 20, 1982, on CBS.[https://web.archive.org/web/20120912024723/http://dianaslegacy.com/Difilms/?page_id=8 Film information] at Diana's Legacy

Cast



*Catherine Oxenberg - Lady Diana Spencer

*Christopher Baines - Charles, Prince of Wales

*Olivia de Havilland - Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother

*Dana Wynter - Queen Elizabeth II

*Ray Milland - Mr. Griffiths

*Stewart Granger - Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh

*Holland Taylor - Frances Shand Kydd

*George Martin - John Spencer, 8th Earl Spencer

Reception



The movie debuted on United States television on the CBS network on Monday, September 20, 1982, and was the most watched prime-time television show of the week, with a 24.0 Nielsen rating and 37 share.(4 October 1982). [http://www.americanradiohistory.com/Archive-BC/BC-1982/1982-10-04-BC.pdf New season off to semi-start], 'Broadcasting', p.50 It outperformed ABC's 'Charles and Diana: A Royal Love Story', which had aired three days earlier but had been only the 28th most watched show in America for the prior week.(29 September 1982). [https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/121645625/ CBS romance with royalty wins Nielsen-race crown], 'Arizona Republic' (Associated Press)

John J. O'Connor, television critic for 'The New York Times', found that the movie was "much more fixated on the purely romantic possibilities of the story" of Charles and Diana compared to its ABC competition. Instead of touching on any contemporary problems in Britain, the film provides "an outrageously gooey theme song and periodic helicopter shots of stunning countryside," and "emotional high points" such as Diana deciding to get a hair cut. O'Connor opined that Olivia de Havilland played the Queen Mother "with beatific elegance" and Dana Wynter played Queen Elizabeth II "with infinite reserve."O'Connor, John J. (20 September 1982). [https://www.nytimes.com/1982/09/20/arts/tv-the-royal-romance-on-cbs.html 'The Royal Romance' on CBS], 'The New York Times'

Tom Shales' review for 'The Washington Post' was a great deal less kind, disliking the fairytale nature of the movie. He called it a piece of "slack-jawed heraldic voyeurism incapable of, and apparently uninterested in, transforming remote news figures into believable mortals." Shales preferred the ABC movie, calling it "48 times better," and decrying Diana's representation as "something of a Pollyanna, or a Cinderella - a sweet innocent sprite upon whom a fairy godmother bestowed a few crucial wishes."Shales, Tom (20 September 1982). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/1982/09/20/cbs-bows-too-deeply-to-charles-and-diana/23ac0acd-51df-465b-9077-33fb6d306b8c/ CBS Bows too Deeply to Charles and Diane], 'The Washington Post'

Production



The movie was filmed in Westbury, New York; Brewster, New York; and New York City, as well as in England.Corry, John (26 June 1982). [https://www.nytimes.com/1982/06/26/arts/briefs-on-the-arts-238192.html Brief on the Arts], 'The New York Times'

That the ABC and CBS films debuted three days apart was not a coincidence. CBS had planned to show 'Royal Romance' in December as a Hallmark-sponsored pre-Christmas film, but then moved the air date back to September, even before the official start of the new ratings season. ABC then jumped their movie ahead of CBS, so late in the game that 'TV Guide' did not list it.Bedell, Sally (24 August 1982). [https://www.nytimes.com/1982/08/24/arts/tv-season-caution-is-the-keynote.html TV Season: Caution is the Keynote], 'The New York Times' (this article reported on August 24, 1982, that ABC believed CBS would show 'Romance' on September 27) When one reviewer asked to get a preview of either movie, he was told in one case "Are you kidding? They're still gluing the tape together."Unger, Aurther (17 September 1982) [https://www.csmonitor.com/1982/0917/091700.html Re-creating the royal wedding -- and network news troubles], 'Christian Science Monitor'Hanauer, Joan (14 September 1982). [https://www.upi.com/Archives/1982/09/14/SUBSTITUTE-WITNESS/8967400824000/ Substitute Witness], UPI (the 'Hallmark' film for December 1982 ended up being a remake of 'Witness for the Prosecution')Clark, Kenneth R. (15 September 1982). [https://www.upi.com/Archives/1982/09/15/TV-World/7158400910400/ TV World], 'UPI' (as of September 15, 1982, UPI was reporting that the ABC did not have an air date, even though it ended up airing on September 17)

Legacy



As is typical of television movies developed to leverage the popularity of current events, 'The Royal Romance of Charles and Diana' has been called a "forgettable" movie with only occasional press references (such as that it was Oxenburg's acting debut). The movie has never been officially released on VHS or DVD. In 2012, the 'New York Times' reported on a brief spat over the credits for the film, which is likely the most ever written about the movie since 1982, albeit about a minor issue. A dispute arose over whether Janet Grillo could properly claim a "story writer" credit, though it was agreed that she did co-write a story outline for the film.Rohter, Larry (3 September 2012). [https://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/31/at-n-y-u-film-department-a-faculty-dispute-over-a-30-year-old-show/ Dispute Erupts at N.Y.U. Over Credits for 1982 TV Movie], 'The New York Times'

In 2011, producer Linda Yellen returned to the well using the next generation of British royalty to direct the television movie 'William & Catherine: A Royal Romance'.(31 May 2011). [http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/william-kate-royal-love-story-movie-show-effect-princess-diana-couple-article-1.147055 'William and Kate: A Royal Love Story' movie will show the effect of Princess Diana on the couple], 'Daily News' (New York) (Associated Press)

References




Buy The Royal Romance of Charles and Diana now from Amazon

<-- Return to movies from 1982



This work is released under CC-BY-SA. Some or all of this content attributed to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1107685711.