Home | Movies By Year | Movies from 1928
The Last Warning
Buy The Last Warning now from AmazonFirst, read the Wikipedia article. Then, scroll down to see what other TopShelfReviews readers thought about the movie. And once you've experienced the movie, tell everyone what you thought about it.
Wikipedia article
'The Last Warning' is a 1928 American mystery film directed by Paul Leni, and starring Laura La Plante, Montagu Love, and Margaret Livingston. Its plot follows a New York producer's attempt to re-stage a play five years after one of the original cast members was murdered in the theater. The film is based on the 1922 Broadway melodrama of the same name by Thomas F. Fallon, which in turn was based on the story 'House of Fear' by Wadsworth Camp, the father of the writer Madeleine L'Engle.
Conceived as a followup to Leni's wildly successful 1927 production 'The Cat and the Canary' (also starring La Plante), the film was produced by Universal Pictures under Carl Laemmle. Principal photography took place in Los Angeles in the summer of 1928 on sets recycled from Universal's 'The Phantom of the Opera' (1925). It premiered on Christmas Day 1928 before expanding in January 1929, and was released as both a part-sound as well as a silent film; the silent version is the only known extant version. It was the final film directed by Leni before his death from blood poisoning on September 2, 1929.
Response by critics to 'The Last Warning' varied, with many praising its performances and cinematography, though several commented on its incoherent plot, and others criticized its integration of sound, feeling it presented optimally as a silent film. In 2016, Universal Pictures selected the film for restoration, using elements from two different prints owned by the Packard Humanities Institute and the Cinmathque Franaise.
Plot
In a Broadway production of a play entitled 'The Snare', one of the actors, John Woodford, inexplicably dies during a stage performance, and his body disappears. Few clues exist as to what caused his death, aside from several drops of liquid found that resembled chloroform. Rumors of a love triangle between Woodford and two cast members circulate as a possible motive for his death.
Five years after the theater's closure, producer Arthur McHugh decides to solve the mystery by again staging the play with the remaining cast and re-enacting Woodford's murder. During rehearsals in the abandoned theater, strange occurrences plague the cast, including ominous noises, falling scenery, and an unexplained fire. Doris, the lead actress, has her purse stolen from her dressing room by an unseen assailant; Mike Brody, the stage manager, reportedly receives a telegram warning him to drop out of the play, signed by John Woodford, and the theater's new owner, Arthur McHugh, also receives a visit from Woodford's ghost.
The production continues, and during the final rehearsal, Harvey Carleton inexplicably disappears from the stage during a blackout. Doris spots a mysterious masked figure in a theater box in addition to a man resembling John Woodford, but both disappear. Behind a picture hanging on the stage, a lever is discovered which opens a trap door, where the cast find Harvey incoherent. Arthur and Richard Quayle, another cast member, venture inside, where they discover a tunnel that leads to Doris's dressing room.
Arthur has police officers appointed at the theater for the show's opening the following night. During the performance, an electrical wire charged to 400 volts is discovered connected to a candlestick onstage, and Arthur lunges at Richard to prevent him from touching it during the final scene. The unseen masked assailant is discovered hiding inside a grandfather clock onstage, but he drops through a trap door in the floor just after shooting one of the police officers. The assailant scales the theater and throws a dummy resembling John Woodford onto the stage. He then begins swinging from a rope, but is brought back down by a stagehand who cuts it.
The masked assailant is discovered to be Brody, who caused Woodford's death via electrocution and had been behind the "hauntings" to prevent the theater from being used.
Cast
Production
Screenplay and filming
The film was envisioned as a companion piece to director Leni's earlier 'The Cat and the Canary', due to that film's great popularity. Universal assigned Leni to the project under the assumption that his previous success would yield significant box-office results. It is based on the 1922 play of the same name by Thomas F. Fallon, which ran for 238 performances from October 24, 1922, until May 1923 at the Klaw Theatre. Fallon's play was in turn based on the story 'House of Fear' by Wadsworth Camp, the father of writer Madeleine L'Engle.Casting
Actress Laura La Plante, a former-teenage actress who had previously starred in Leni's 'The Cat and the Canary', was given top-billing in her role as Doris Terry, though her part in the film is considerably less involved than in the former. Film historian John Soister characterizes La Plante's role as that of an ingnue, consisting primarily of reactions to "assorted assaults, visions, and set-ups." The film marked La Plante's first talking picture. British actor Montagu Love was cast opposite La Plante, receiving second-billing. Soister notes that Love was "cast against type" for his role, that of "no-nonsense" theater owner Arthur McHugh.Margaret Livingston, an actress who had also begun her career as a teenager, was cast in the role of actress Evalynda Hendon; her performance in the film helped earn her a role in Universal's 'The Charlatan', released later that year. In the role of Richard Quayle, Leni cast actor John Boles, who subsequently had a minor part in 'Frankenstein' (1931). Bert Roach was cast as Mike Brody, the producer who re-stages the play in the film. Barbara, an elderly character actress who starred in the original play in which Woodford was murdered, is portrayed by Dutch actress Carrie Daumery. This was Daumery's only film credit from the silent era, and her role is likened by Soister and others to that of Flora Finch in 'The Cat and the Canary', but stripped of any comedic tone.
Filming
Principal photography began in August 1928. The theater set used in the film had originally been used in the 1925 'The Phantom of the Opera' starring Lon Chaney, and was located in Universal City, California.Release
According to the American Film Institute, 'The Last Warning' had its theatrical debut in New York City on January 6, 1929. However, special advance screenings occurred on Christmas Day 1928 in several U.S. cities, including Chillicothe, Missouri, and Manhattan, Kansas.
The film was marketed as a successor to producer Leni's previous film 'The Cat and the Canary', attributed to producer Laemmle's "discriminating supervision." It is often considered one of the last silent films produced by Universal Studios, but it was also released in a "part-talkie" Movietone version with a brief minute or two of synch-sound footage added, as well as screams, cries, and other sound effects. These scenes have since been lost. Few prints of the film exist in the United States: One is owned by the George Eastman House Motion Picture Collection in Rochester, New York, which was originally owned by the Cinmathque Franaise, and is slightly edited and entirely silent with French intertitles.
Critical response
;ContemporaneousThough it re-teamed Leni with 'The Cat and the Canary' star Laura La Plante and features a similar style, 'The Last Warning' lacks the supernatural elements of 'The Cat and the Canary' and is therefore usually considered in the mystery genre rather than the horror genre; some historians, however, have classed it as a horror film. Elements of comedy present in Leni's 'The Cat and the Canary' are also absent from the film. Extant published reviews of the film were varied.
Mordaunt Hall of 'The New York Times' noted the film contained "some finely directed passages," but that it was "not especially disturbing." Martin Dickstein of the 'Brooklyn Daily Eagle' described the film as being "related with such vagueness that the picture fail[s] to hold together," but praised Leni's "propitious use of 'the camera angle,' and it is through this inventive maneuvering of the lens that the picture achieves at least a visual significance." A critic of the 'Los Angeles Times' similarly found the cinematography "highly interesting" and the plot "lost in a maze of double and triple exposures," adding that there "is a decided lack of spontaneity in the sound sequences."
The majority of the criticism surrounding the film had to do with its integration of sound. Irene Thirer of the 'New York Daily News', who felt the film "should never have been a talkie," elaborating that the dialogue episodes "retard the action" and "are not well done." 'The Montana Standard' noted that the film "presents many thrills" and was widely enjoyed by the audiences at the film's premiere in Butte. A critic of the 'Hartford Courant' alternately felt that, "as a talking picture, the film retains all the chill values of the play, with its eerie noises, screams, fright-fraught dialogue and general noise and excitement," but conceded that "it decidedly is not the scary kind of mystery play that the average person would find too startling." Sid Silverman, writing for 'Variety', noted the use of sound effects as "multiple, continuous, and in detail," and that the film included "enough screams to stimulate the average film mob into sticking through it." Hall also criticized the film's utilization of sound, writing: "There are too many outbursts of shrieking, merely to prove the effect of the audible screen, to cause any spine-chilling among those watching this production."
The 'Chillicothe Constitution-Tribune' noted that 'The Last Warning' "the most thrilling mystery film released this season," while the 'Billings Gazette' deemed it "the greatest mystery picture ever filmed." 'Photoplay' was less laudatory, noting: "This could have been a gorgeous mystery story, but it's an obvious cross between 'The Phantom of the Opera' and 'The Terror', with none of their consistency or power."
;Retrospective
In a retrospective assessment, author and film critic Leonard Maltin awarded the film two and a half out of four stars, commending its camerawork and direction, but criticizing the film's story as "silly." Commenting on the finale, film historian Graham Petrie notes that Leni and cinematographer Hal Mohr "handle the camera with the utmost possible freedom, culminating in a scene in which the camera swings on a rope with the villain from one part of the theater to another. Along the way, Leni revels in the shadows, cobwebs, tilted angles, subtly distorted perspectives, ominously confined spaces, and clutching hands that had by now become his trademark." Petrie, who classifies the film as a thriller rather than a mystery, emphasizes that its stylistic and visual elements supersede narrative plausibility and characterization.
2016 restoration
In 2016, the film underwent digital restoration by Universal Pictures, sourced from both the Cinmathque Franaise print, as well as a print featuring the original English title cards owned by the Packard Humanities Institute Collection of the UCLA Film & Television Archive. The restored print was screened at the Castro Theatre as part of the San Francisco Silent Film Festival on June 4, 2016. It was again screened in September 2016 at Cinecon Classic Film Festival in Los Angeles. This restored edition of the film had its home media premiere in a Blu-ray and DVD combination set by Flicker Alley in 2019.Other adaptations
'The Last Warning' was re-made in 1939 by Joe May under the title 'The House of Fear'. Universal made another movie titled 'The Last Warning' in 1938, but it has no connection to the Leni film.
References
Sources
*
*
*
*
*
*
Buy The Last Warning now from Amazon
<-- Return to movies from 1928